A source-led guide to reading disaster-risk financing, public scheme, protection-gap, catastrophe, and reinsurance references without turning them into scheme rankings or coverage advice.
A source-led guide to reading property and casualty claims, catastrophe, protection-gap, and market-size references without turning them into pricing, coverage, or ranking claims.
A guide to separating public ILS market signals, broker commentary, and traditional reinsurer capacity references without inferring live capacity or placement terms.
Catastrophe-risk analysis can become misleading when climate-risk evidence, protection-gap evidence, and reinsurance-capacity evidence are treated as though they measure the same thing. Readers can consult the Climate and Catastrophe Risk Tracker, the Protection Gap Tracker, and Reinsurance Capacity…
Reinsurance capacity can be overstated when public capital figures are treated as immediately available protection. The Reinsurance Capacity Watch brings together public capital, solvency, renewal, and ILS signals, but none establishes available capacity, pricing, terms, or appetite for…
Swiss Re's sigma work and IAIS's NatCat protection-gap special topic edition frame natural catastrophe losses as more than a property-insurance pricing problem: the gap between economic losses and insured losses affects households, businesses, public balance sheets, reinsurers, and…
Protection-gap figures can be useful, but they need careful reading when definitions, time periods, risk categories, inflation assumptions, and data sources are not clear. Thesis Sureligence analysis should treat protection-gap data as a starting point for market inquiry,…